Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 1;339:b3692. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3692

Table 5.

Sensitivity analysis of the seven high dose trials from the primary analysis and the seven eligible high dose trials that did not meet the criteria for the primary analysis

Study (daily dose of vitamin D) Number of participants Number of fallers/total treated Number of fallers/total control Effect relative risk Lower 95% CI Upper 95% CI Q test P value I2 Fall reduction
Pooled primary analysis of the seven high dose trials (w1(800),w2,w3,w4,w5,w6,w7) 1921 435/959 528/962 0.81 0.71 0.92 0.12 41% -19%
Sensitivity analysis including the seven high dose trials that did not meet criteria for primary analysis
Grant et al, 2005w9 (800 IU D3) 5292 380/2649 381/2643 1.00 0.87 1.14
Trivedi et al, 2003w10 (800 IU D3) 2038 254/1027 261/1011 0.96 0.83 1.11
Chapuy et al, 2002w11 (800 D3) 583 251/393 118/190 1.03 0.90 1.17
Kärkkäinen et al, 2007w12 (800 IU D3) 3432 180/1718 209/1714 0.86 0.71 1.04
Law et al, 2006 w13 (1100 IU D2) 3717 770/1762 833/1955 1.03 0.95 1.10
Harwood et al, 2004w14 (800 IU D3) 76 7/39 13/37 0.51 0.23 1.11
Latham et al, 2003w15 (1600 IU D2) 222 64/108 60/114 1.13 0.89 1.42
Pooled sensitivity analysis (w1(800),w2,w3,w4,w5,w6,w7,w9,w10,w11,w12,w13,w14,w16) 17 281 2341/8655 2403/8626 0.92 0.85 0.99 0.006 56% -8%

Q test: P<0.100 indicates heterogeneity.

I2 estimates above 25% are considered to represent modest heterogeneity, and values above 50% represent large heterogeneity beyond chance.