Table 5.

Results from Bayesian single- and multi-environmental QTL mapping of the simulated dataset

Marker	Chr.a	Pos.b	Effect typec	Env.d	True effect	Bayes singlee	Bayes multif
						Estimated effect	Estimated effect (unstandardized)	Occ. prob.g
16	1H	144	M	1	3.5	3.27	3.39	1
				2	3.5	3.30	3.39	1
				3	3.5	3.38	3.39	1
				4	3.5	3.63	3.39	1
				5	3.5	3.53	3.39	1
				6	3.5	3.64	3.39	1
22	2H	80	M + Ic	1	−2.1	−2.41	−1.98	1
				2	−3.5	−3.45	−3.33	1
				3	−2.1	−1.90	−1.98	1
				4	−2.1	−2.11	−1.98	1
				5	0.4	0	0.21	0.98
				6	−2.1	−2.14	−1.98	1
31	3H	25	Ic	1	0	0	0.24	0
				2	−3.3	−3.25	−2.85	1
				3	2.8	2.94	0.24	0
				4	1.7	2.16	2.12	0.90
				5	−2.3	0	0.24	0
				6	0	0	0.24	0
32	3H	30	–	1	0	0	−0.14	0
				2	0	0	−0.14	0
				3	0	0	2.04	0.99
				4	0	0	−0.14	0
				5	0	−1.71	−1.94	0.99
				6	0	0	−0.14	0
40	3H	155	Inc	1	1.2	1.01	1.22	0.99
				2	0	0	−0.06	0
				3	0	0	−0.06	0
				4	2.1	2.29	2.56	1
				5	0	0	−0.06	0
				6	0.8	0	0.77	0.59
45	4H	21	M	1	−1.3	−1.37	−1.08	0.50
				2	−1.3	−0.96	−1.08	0.50
				3	−1.3	−1.53	−1.09	0.50
				4	−1.3	−1.77	−1.09	0.51
				5	−1.3	−1.09	−1.08	0.49
				6	−1.3	−1.38	−1.08	0.50
53	4H	125	Inc	1	0	0	0.16	0
				2	−3.1	−3.21	−3.13	1
				3	0	0	0.16	0
				4	−2.2	−2.18	−2.13	1
				5	0	0	0.16	0
				6	−2.8	−2.77	−2.68	1
65	5H	43	Ic	1	0.3	0	−0.21	0.06
				2	0.9	0.92	0.98	0.86
				3	−0.8	−0.06	−0.43	0.01
				4	0	0	−0.42	0
				5	−0.2	0	−0.43	0
				6	−0.6	0	−0.42	0
75	6H	96	M	1	1.8	1.99	1.58	1
				2	1.8	1.62	1.58	1
				3	1.8	1.83	1.58	1
				4	1.8	1.86	1.58	1
				5	1.8	1.86	1.58	1
				6	1.8	1.28	1.58	1
79	6H	135	M	1	0.2	0	0.08	0
				2	0.2	0	0.08	0
				3	0.2	0	0.08	0
				4	0.2	0	0.08	0
				5	0.2	0	0.08	0
				6	0.2	0	0.07	0
92	7H	146	M + Inc	1	2.5	2.45	2.06	1
				2	2.5	2.50	2.06	1
				3	0.6	0	0.84	0.02
				4	1.2	1.24	2.06	1
				5	2.5	2.32	2.06	1
				6	2.5	2.71	2.06	1

Significant markers with chromosomal positions, effect type, environment, true and estimated effects and occupancy probabilities of marker effects being higher than the significance threshold are shown

^aChromosomal location of the markers

^bPosition of the markers on the chromosome in centiMorgan (cM)

^cEffect type of the marker: M = marker main effect; I_c =  marker interaction effect (crossover); I_nc = marker interaction effect (non-cross-over); M + I_c = marker main and interaction (crossover) effect; M + I_nc = marker main and interaction (non-crossover) effect

^dIn the computer simulation, the environment where the lines were cultivated

^eBayesian single-environmental QTL mapping

^fBayesian multi-environmental QTL mapping

^gOccupancy probability of marker effects being higher than the significance threshold in Bayesian multi-environmental mapping