Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 26;297(3):H1010–H1019. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01195.2008

Table 2.

Comparison of measurements between novel and conventional MST strategies from the same hearts of four pigs

Strategy M0,PCrMss,PCr/M0,PCr T1,PCrapp, s T1,PCrapp, s kf, s
Conventional 0.65±0.01 1.53±0.05 4.3±0.2 0.42±0.01
Novel 0.65±0.01 1.56±0.08 4.4±0.2 0.42±0.03

In the conventional approach, progressive saturation transfer experiment with long d1 was employed to obtain T1,PCrapp, and long d1 plus long d2 was employed for Mss,PCr measurement. kf was calculated using Eq. 3, and T1,PCrapp was calculated using Eq. 2. The novel approach used d1,opt plus d2,opt to obtain the Mss,PCr measurement. T1,PCrapp was calculated from two spectra (B2 in Fig. 5 and C3 in Fig. 6), according to Eq. 10: T1,PCrapp = −TR/ln(1 − MTR,PCr/Mss,PCr). Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in any measurement obtained by novel and conventional strategies.