Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 26;297(3):H1010–H1019. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01195.2008

Table 3.

Comparison of total data acquisition time required for MST measurements between novel and conventional strategies

Strategy M0 and Mss, TR × nt, s T1,PCrapp, TR × nt × np, s kf, min
Conventional (12 + 20) × 12 14.6 × 12 × 6 23.9
Novel (12 + 5.5) × 12 1.5 × 30 × 1 4.3

T1,PCrapp was calculated from curve fitting of 6 time points (np = 6). In the conventional approach, 14.6 is the average TR for 6 points. All points were acquired with 12 averaged FIDs (nt = 12). In the novel approach, only TR = 1.5 s spectrum (nt = 30, Fig. 6C3) was used to calculate T1,PCrapp, together with Mss measurement (nt = 12, Fig. 5B2), according to Eq. 10.