Table 1.
Patient characteristics
ID | Diagnosis | Sex | Age, y | Previous chemotherapy | Cytogenetic risk group* | IPSS | Best response |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | AML-TLD | M | 38 | No | Poor | NA | CR |
2 | AML-TLD | M | 78 | No | Poor | NA | NR |
3 | AML-TLD | F | 63 | No | Poor | NA | NR |
4 | MDS | M | 43 | No | Good | INT-1 | CR |
5 | MDS | M | 61 | No | Poor | INT-2 | NR |
6 | MDS | M | 79 | No | Good | INT-1 | NR |
7 | MDS | F | 64 | No | Good | INT-2 | PR |
8 | MDS | M | 84 | No | Good | INT-1 | NR |
9 | AML-TLD | F | 55 | No | Good | NA | NR |
10 | AML-relapse | M | 67 | No | Poor | NA | PR |
11 | CMMoL | F | 61 | No | Good | INT-1 | HI |
12 | MDS | M | 66 | No | Intermediate | INT-2 | HI |
13 | MDS | M | 74 | No | Intermediate | INT-2 | HI |
14 | MDS | F | 61 | No | Good | INT-2 | NR |
15 | AML-refractory | F | 35 | Yes | Poor | NA | NR |
16 | AML-TLD | M | 83 | No | Good | NA | PR |
17 | MDS | M | 74 | No | Good | INT-1 | HI |
18 | MDS | M | 75 | No | Good | INT-2 | HI |
19 | MDS | M | 52 | No | Intermediate | INT-1 | NR |
20 | AML-TLD | M | 70 | Yes | Good | NA | HI |
21 | AML-refractory | F | 58 | Yes | Intermediate | NA | NR |
22 | MDS | M | 59 | No | Good | INT-1 | PR |
23 | CMMoL | M | 65 | No | Poor | NA† | NR |
24 | CMMoL | M | 55 | No | Intermediate | INT-1 | NR |
25 | MDS | M | 51 | No | Good | INT-2 | NR |
26 | AML-TLD | M | 61 | No | Intermediate | NA | NR |
27 | CMMoL | M | 69 | No | Intermediate | NA† | NR |
28 | AML-TLD | F | 48 | Yes | Good | NA | CR |
29 | AML-TLD | F | 65 | No | Intermediate | NA | HI |
30 | MDS | M | 78 | Yes | Intermediate | High | NR |
AML-TLD indicates AML with trilineage dysplasia; CMMoL, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia; NA, not applicable; INT-1, intermediate-1; INT-2, intermediate-2; and IPSS, International Prognostic Scoring System.
Cytogenetic risk group assigned per IPSS categorization.
CMMoL patients with white blood cell count more than 12 × 109 monocytes/L (121000/μL) were not given an IPSS score.