Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 3.
Published in final edited form as: Science. 2008 Mar 28;319(5871):1842–1845. doi: 10.1126/science.1152837

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Effects of aversive olfactory conditioning. (A) SCR significantly increased for tgCS+ at post- vs. pre-conditioning, when compared to CS− stimuli (p = 0.05; Wilcoxon test, two-tailed). (B) During conditioning, tgCS+-evoked activity in amygdala exhibited significant time-dependent response decline, relative to the CS− pair. Activations superimposed on coronal T1-weighted scans (display threshold, p < 0.001). (C) From pre- to post-conditioning, bilateral OFC showed enhanced responses to tgCS+ relative to CS− (axial T1 section; threshold, p < 0.005). (D) Plots of percent signal change for peak activity in left OFC are shown for each condition.