Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 3.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2005 Jan;112(1):10–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.07.018

Table 3.

Correlations between Mean Deviation index of Standard Automated Perimetry and vertical Cup-to-Disc ratio

Group Mean Deviation index of Standard Automated Perimetry versus vertical Cup-to-Disc ratio Mean Deviation index of Standard Automated Perimetry Asymmetry versus vertical Cup-to-Disc ratio Asymmetry
GS + EMG r = −0.074 (P = 0.104 n.s.) r = −0.196 (P = 0.002)
GS r = 0.0433 (P = 0.39 n.s.) r = −0.124 (P = 0.083 n.s.)
EMG r = −0.0007 (P = 0.949 n.s.) r = −0.312 (P = 0.044)

C/D = vertical cup-to-disc ratio; EMG = early manifest glaucoma; GS = glaucoma suspect; MD = mean deviation index of standard automated perimetry; n.s. = not significant.