Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 9;85(4):427–446. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2009.08.018

Table 1.

ATM and Ortholog Sequence Accession Numbers and Cross-Species Sequence Comparisons

Organism Accession Number GenBank cDNA (%)a Gene Model (%)b Confirmation by Sequencing (%)c Pairwise Amino Acid Sequence Identity (%)d
Hs Mm Ss Md Gg Xl Dr Bf
Homo sapiens AAB65827.1 100.0 0.0 0.0
Mus musculus NP_031525.2 100.0 0.0 0.0 84.1
Sus scrofa AAT01608.1 100.0 0.0 0.0 88.4 82.6
Monodelphis domestica ACG68567.1, ACG68568.1 0.0 88.7e 11.3 80.7 76.2 78.9
Gallus gallus XP_417160.2 0.0 99.7 + 0.3f 0.0 69.5 66.7 68.5 70.5
Xenopus laevis AAT72929.1 100.0 0.0 64.5 62.7 63.6 65.9 64.6
Danio rerio BAD91491.1 ACJ03990.1 89.4 0.3f 10.6 54.2 53.2 53.4 53.9 53.4 54.3
Branchiostoma floridae ACG68443.1 0.0 0.0 100.0 36.9 36.3 36.6 36.5 37.2 37.7 36.6
Strongylocentrotus purpuratus ABY60856.1 0.0 0.0 100.0 34.8 34.6 34.7 35.0 35.9 35.3 35.2 38.1
a

This is the percentage of the ATM amino acid sequence used in our alignment that was obtained directly from a GenBank cDNA entry.

b

This is the percentage of the ATM amino acid sequence used in our alignment that was obtained by gene prediction.

c

This is the percentage of the ATM amino acid sequence used in our alignment that we confirmed by RT-PCR and sequencing from model-organism cDNA.

d

The two-letter species-name abbreviations are as follows: Hs, Homo sapiens; Mm, Mus musculus; Ss, Sus scrofa; Md, Monodelphis domestica; Gg, Gallus gallus; Xl, Xenopus laevis; Dr, Danio rerio; Bf, Branchiostoma floridae. Note that the cross-comparison does not require a column for Strongylocentrotus purpuratus.

e

Gene model built at IARC, but similar to Ensemble prediction ENSMODP00000018290.

f

Corrections to apparent anomalies in a gene-model prediction obtained from GenBank, made by reference to the genomic sequence.