Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Sep 29;15(19):6167–6176. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0645

Table 1.

Immune regression of established tumors depends on both the magnitude of immune response and tumor size at the initiation of vaccination.

*Initiation of Immunotherapy
(Day post-challenge)
Tumor Volume at initiation of Immunotherapy
(mm3)
E7 Tetramer Response
(% of CD8)
Disease Outcome
(%)
Day 7 (n=83) 11.8+/-2.0 19.0+/-2.2 p = 0.01 In Remission
(69%, n = 57)
p < 0.001
11.1 +/-2.3 9.5 +/- 2.2 Progressing
(31%, n=26)
Day 14 (n=40) 24.9 +/- 5.8
p = 0.2
19.3+/-2.9 In Remission
(8%, n=3)
p = 0.03
39.2 +/- 3.5 19.7+/-2.7 Progressing
(92%, n = 37)
Day 20 (n=40) 26.0 +/- 14.3
p = 0.048
18.2+/-8.1 In Remission
(8%, n = 3)
p = 0.02
137+/-15.3 21.6+/-2.7 Progressing
(92%, n = 37)
Day 28 (n=10) N/A N/A In Remission
(0%)
238.9 +/- 64.0 31.1 +/-3.9 Progressing
(100%, n = 10)
*

All mice received lymph node-targeted immunotherapy consisting of four injections of E7 49-57 peptide + pI:C on day 1, 4, 15 and 18 starting at indicated time intervals following C3.43 tumor challenge.

Maximum tumor size at the initiation of immunotherapy that completely regressed for each treatment group, day 7, 14, and 20, was 37.8, 81.3, and 112.1 mm3 respectively.

Immune response was evaluated by E7 49-57 tetramer assay 10 days following the last vaccination for each group.