Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 5.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacotherapy. 2008 Sep;28(9):1084–1097. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.9.1084

Table 6.

Randomized studies comparing genotype based warfarin therapy (Target INR 2–3) to standard medical care in assessing warfarin response

Caraco et al, 2007a Anderson et al, 2007 b
Population Characteristics
Number of subjects evaluated 191 (95 PG, 96 STD) Ф 200 (101 PG, 99 STD)Ф
Racial/ Ethnic Group 100% European descent 95% European descent
Study Characteristics
Follow- up (Mean ± SD) Different in two arms 46 ± 32 days
INR assessment schedule Daily until target INR is
sustained for 2 days then
at least twice weekly
until stabilized
Days 0, 3, 5, 8, 21, 60, 90,
and as clinically indicated
Polymorphisms assessed
CYP2C9 *2, *3 *2, *3
VKORC1 NE 1173C/T
Genotype guided therapy:
Improved dose prediction NE Yes, p<0.001
% Variance in dose predicted by genes
(genes + clinical covariates)
NE 32 % (47%)
↓number of dose changes NE Yes, however follow-up
duration and indication
differed across groups
↓INR monitoring frequency Yes Yes, however follow-up
duration and indication
differed across groups
Influenced time to target INR PG attained target INR
sooner
No
Influenced time to stable dose PG attained stable INR
sooner
No
↓ out-of-range INRs Yes (<1.8 or >3.4) No (<1.8 or >3.2)
↑ Time in target range Higher in PG group No
↓ risk of over-anticoagulation Yes No
↓ risk of complicationsψ For Minor bleed, p<0.02 NE
Ф

PG denotes genotype-guided therapy; STD denotes standard medical therapy

Anderson et al defined Stable dose as dose (after day 8) that was associated with ≥ 2 (within 15%) INRs in target range measured ≥ 1 week apart. Caraco et al defined stable dose as the dose associated with ≥ 2 INRs in target range, measured ≥ 1 week apart.

Primary Endpoint

NE: Not evaluated or not reported

ψ

Although all studies defined adverse event as a composite endpoint including INR ≥4, major (and minor) hemorrhage and recurrent thromboembolic event, the cohort size and follow-up duration did not facilitate evaluation of hemorrhagic or thromboembolic complications.

a

Caraco et al 87

b

Anderson et al 88