Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 9.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2009 May 26;119(22):2886–2893. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.837369

Table 3.

Incidence of abnormal autonomic measurements at EDIC year 13/14 among subjects with intact function at DCCT closeout

Characteristic Group Incident Abnormal
Function, No. (%)
Unadjusted Odds
Ratio
(95% CI)
Adjusted Odds
Ratio
(95% CI)c
HbA1c Adjusted
Odds Ratio
(95% CI)c
R-R Variation < 15 INT 109 (18.8) 0.76 (0.57–1.02) 0.70 (0.51–0.96) 1.36 (0.84–2.19)
CONV 125 (23.2)
Valsalva Ratio ≤ 1.5 INT 113 (19.7) 0.92 (0.69–1.23) 0.85 (0.62–1.16) 0.86 (0.54–1.36)
CONV 112 (21.1)
Abnormal CAN function b INT 141 (24.4)a 0.76 (0.59–0.995) 0.69 (0.51–0.93) 1.31 (0.83–2.07)
CONV 159 (29.8)

CAN Cardiac autonomic neuropathy, EDIC Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications, DCCT Diabetes Control and Complications Trial, INT intensive, CONV conventional

a

P < 0.05 for treatment group differences by the chi-square test comparing INT and CONV treatment groups.

b

Abnormal CAN function was defined as any one of the following conditions: R-R variation < 15; R-R variation < 20 in combination with Valsalva ratio ≤ 1.5; or Postural hypotension.

c

Logistic regression models were adjusted for DCCT baseline age, sex, cohort assignment and duration in the DCCT study. Models for R-R variation <15 were also adjusted for R-R variation at DCCT closeout, models for Valsalva ratio ≤ 1.5 adjusted for Valsalva ratio at DCCT closeout, and models for abnormal CAN function adjusted for both quantitative measures. HbA1c models include both the mean HbA1c level during DCCT and during EDIC.