Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 5.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Intern Med. 2008 Nov 4;149(9):601–611. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00003

APPENDIX TABLE 4.

EFFECTS OF TREATMENT ON BONE MINERAL DENSITY

BASELINE 6 MONTHS 12 MONTHS
Mean (SD) minimum-maximum Mean Change * 95% CI P Value MK-677 vs. Placebo Mean Change * 95% CI P Value MK-677 vs. Placebo
BONE MINERAL DENSITY
Femoral Neck, g/cm2 Placebo N=22 0.752 (0.137) 0.584-1.101 0.010 -0.001-0.021 0.012 0.002-0.022
MK-677 N=43 0.748 (0.133) 0.522-1.066 -0.003 -0.011-0.005 0.079 -0.005 -0.01-0.002 0.004
Spine [L2-L4], g/cm2 Placebo N=22 1.046 (0.164) 0.770-1.441 0.004 -0.013-0.022 0.005 -0.010-0.020
MK-677 N=43 1.085 (0.196) 0.761-1.630 0.001 -0.012-0.013 >.99 0.008 -0-0.019 0.69
Total Hip, g/cm2 Placebo N=22 0.910 (0.160) 0.688-1.315 0.005 -0.003-0.014 0.005 -0.003-0.013
MK-677 N=43 0.896 (0.138) 0.686-1.183 -0.002 -0.008-0.004 0.22 -0.004 -0.01-0.002 0.063

Baseline data presented are the arithmetic mean (SD) and the minimum and maximum values

*

Mean change (arithmetic difference) from baseline with 95% confidence limits at 6 months and at 12 months

P values are for the pivotal comparisons between the two groups at 6 months and at 12 months.

Bone mineral density was determined by DXA.