Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 5.

Published in final edited form as: J Occup Organ Psychol. 2008 Sep 1;81(3):411–433. doi: 10.1348/096317908X315495

Table 2. Pairwise Pearson Correlation Coefficients among Dimensions of Fit.

Total Sample (N=753)
		(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)	(5)	(6)	(7)	(8)	(9)¹	(10)
(1)	Positive F-W spillover		-0.101^**	0.353^**	-0.015	0.002	-0.079^*	0.066	0.072^*	0.142^**	0.095^**
(2)	Negative F-W spillover			0.115^**	0.372^**	0.244^**	0.499^**	-0.114^**	-0.143^**	-0.187^**	-0.311^**
(3)	Positive W-F spillover				0.025	-0.034	0.037	0.126^**	0.090^*	0.039	0.056
(4)	Negative W-F spillover					0.628^**	0.212^**	-0.394^**	-0.195^**	-0.108^**	-0.534^**
(5)	Netemeyer W-F conflict						0.276^**	-0.563^**	-0.142^**	-0.038	-0.623^**
(6)	Netemeyer F-W conflict							-0.094^**	-0.144^**	-0.134^**	-0.251^**
(7)	Work schedule fit scale								0.076^*	0.079^*	0.471^**
(8)	Job security assessment scale									0.154^**	0.172^**
(9)	Income adequacy										0.207^**
(10)	Time adequacy scale

^*

P<.05

^**

P<.01, two-tailed tests.