Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2009 Jul 18;116(10):1937–1942. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.03.012

Table 2.

Diabetes Duration and Period of Diagnosis of Type 1 Diabetes Models for Visual Impairment.

Models Adjusted Models*
Contrast OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value
Duration of diabetes (years)
 10–14 vs 5–9 1.21 (0.54–2.69) .64 1.11 (0.45–2.79) .82
 15–19 vs 10–14 2.35 (1.33–4.16) .003 1.10 (0.58–2.10) .76
 20–24 vs 15–19 0.92 (0.62–1.39) .71 0.69 (0.41–1.14) .15
 25–29 vs 20–24 0.82 (0.56–1.19) .29 0.76 (0.47–1.22) .25
 30–34 vs 25–29 1.31 (0.90–1.90) .16 1.21 (0.75–1.94) .44
 35+ vs 30–34 1.17 (0.83–1.65) .36 1.01 (0.62–1.63) .98
Duration- ordered factor 1.15 (1.05–1.26) .003 0.93 (0.78–1.10) .40
Period of diagnosis of diabetes
 1960–1969 vs 1922–1959 0.44 (0.28–0.68) <.001 0.42 (0.24–0.71) .001
 1970–1974 vs 1960–1969 0.27 (0.15–0.48) <.001 0.29 (0.15–0.57) <.001
 1975+ vs 1970–1974 1.46 (0.72–2.98) .30 1.85 (0.81–4.22) .15
Period of diagnosis- ordered factor 0.91 (0.88–0.93) <.001 0.91 (0.88–0.94) <.001

Abbreviations: OR=odds ratio; CI=confidence interval.

*

Duration and diagnosis models further adjusted for: age at the examination, gender, glycosylated hemoglobin A1, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, presence of proteinuria, and laser treatment

Ordered factor effects were fit using the categorical variable as a linear effect in separate model