Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Vis. 2009 Jan 12;9(1):6.1–619. doi: 10.1167/9.1.6

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Comparison of POSN cue effectiveness in monocular and binocular stimuli. Data from the six trainees (S1–S6) in Figure 4 are re-plotted as cue moments (d*) for the POSN cue. Gray boxes show 50% confidence intervals and black bars show 95% confidence intervals, computed using a bootstrap procedure that resampled data and fitted a probit model as in Figure 4. Confidence intervals for trainee S5 could not be reliably estimated from the data.