Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009 Jun;28(6):515–520. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318198c724

TABLE 4.

Logistic regression modeling of the association between persistent positive CMV cultures and delayed hearing loss*

Delayed hearing loss OR (95% CI)
A
Age at last culture-positive visit 1.05 (1.01–1.08)b
Type of neonatal infection
 Asymptomatic 1
 Symptomatic 5.9 (1.8–18.9)
Age at last hearing evaluation 0.99 (0.96–1.01)
Number of viral culture visits 0.87 (0.59–1.30)
B
Number of culture-positive visits 1.05 (0.66–1.69)
Type of neonatal infection
 Asymptomatic 1
 Symptomatic 4.4 (1.5–12.6)
Age at last hearing evaluation 1.00 (0.98–1.02)
Number of viral culture visits 0.96 (0.64–1.43)
*

The 21 children with delayed hearing loss were matched 3-to-1 by age at last hearing evaluation with 63 randomly selected children who did not develop hearing loss. Model A used age at last culture-positive visit as the exposure variable. Model B used number of culture-positive visits as the exposure variable. The other covariates were the same for the two models.

Comparing 1-month age differences.

Comparing 1-visit differences.

CMV, cytomegalovirus; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.