Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 6.
Published in final edited form as: Chem Res Toxicol. 2008 May 8;21(6):1304–1314. doi: 10.1021/tx800063r

Table 3.

Classification of 5-HT2B Active and Nonactive Compounds Using Shape Signatures or MOE Descriptors with Different Methods

leave-42-out testingd
classification methoda descriptorsb 10-fold cross-validationc (%) SE (%) SP (%) Q (%) C
SVM shape only 80 81 59 73 0.424
UFS-SVM shape + charges 87 91 69 83 0.638
UFS-SVM MOE (2D) 87 91 70 84 0.640
UFS-SOMe shape + charges 86 78 54 70 0.345
k-NN (k = 3) shape only 69 86 46 72 0.352
k-NN (k = 1) shape + charges 74 93 53 79 0.527
a

The specified values of k for k-NN classifications are those that yield the maximum average overall prediction accuracies Q for the leave-42-out experiments.

b

“Shape only” labels descriptor sets derived from the 1D Shape Signatures histograms, and “shape + charges” designates descriptors sets based on the 2D Shape Signatures histograms.

c

This column lists prediction accuracies estimated from 10-fold cross-validations performed on the entire data set.

d

The tabulated values of SE, SP, Q, and C are averages over 30 different hold-out test sets.

e

On average, one active and one nonactive molecule were unclassified.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure