Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct;44(5 Pt 2):1863–1879. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01012.x

Table 3.

Pre- and Post-QI Project Survey Results (N=46, 70.8% Response Rate)

Reaction Pre Post t-Statistics
Relevance of QI 3.33 4.65 <0.01
Management interest in project 4.31 4.72 <0.01
Availability of resources needed 2.98 3.53 <0.01
Satisfaction working on project 4.17

Learning Usefulness Future Applicability t-Statistics

Model for improvement 4.40 4.53 NS
PDSA cycle 4.49 4.70 <0.05
Process mapping 4.44 4.65 <0.01
Control charts 3.98 4.33 <0.05
Run chart 4.21 4.47 <0.05
Cause and effect diagram 4.33 4.62 <0.05
Memory jogger 4.37 4.53 NS
Radar chart 4.14 4.30 NS
Aim specification 4.44 4.65 <0.05
Measure development 4.28 4.69 <0.05

Behavior Pre Post t-Statistics

Qualified to implement a QI project 2.78 4.19 <0.01
Likelihood of future participation 3.61 4.47 <0.01

Outcome Pre Post

Concern that costs exceed benefits 3.02
Level of success of QI project 4.29

Note. Scale: 1 (low) to 5 (high).

NS, not significant.