Table 3.
Reaction | Pre | Post | t-Statistics |
---|---|---|---|
Relevance of QI | 3.33 | 4.65 | <0.01 |
Management interest in project | 4.31 | 4.72 | <0.01 |
Availability of resources needed | 2.98 | 3.53 | <0.01 |
Satisfaction working on project | — | 4.17 | — |
Learning | Usefulness | Future Applicability | t-Statistics |
Model for improvement | 4.40 | 4.53 | NS |
PDSA cycle | 4.49 | 4.70 | <0.05 |
Process mapping | 4.44 | 4.65 | <0.01 |
Control charts | 3.98 | 4.33 | <0.05 |
Run chart | 4.21 | 4.47 | <0.05 |
Cause and effect diagram | 4.33 | 4.62 | <0.05 |
Memory jogger | 4.37 | 4.53 | NS |
Radar chart | 4.14 | 4.30 | NS |
Aim specification | 4.44 | 4.65 | <0.05 |
Measure development | 4.28 | 4.69 | <0.05 |
Behavior | Pre | Post | t-Statistics |
Qualified to implement a QI project | 2.78 | 4.19 | <0.01 |
Likelihood of future participation | 3.61 | 4.47 | <0.01 |
Outcome | Pre | Post | |
Concern that costs exceed benefits | — | 3.02 | |
Level of success of QI project | — | 4.29 |
Note. Scale: 1 (low) to 5 (high).
NS, not significant.