Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jun 16;53(24):2259–2261. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.024

Table 1.

The sixteen factors used in considering scientific priority, in alphabetical order

Feasibility
Innovation
Likelihood that entity outside of DPPS would support
Multidisciplinary nature of the research
Potential for impact on individual health
Potential for impact on national health care expenditures
Potential for impact on population health
Qualifications and track record of the proposer
Quality of proposed methods
Quality of writing and organization of the proposal
Relevance to a global (beyond US) agenda
Relevance to the DPPS mission
Relevance to the NHLBI Strategic Plan
Research need/lack of studies
Study cost
Uniqueness or timeliness of opportunity