Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 7.
Published in final edited form as: Child Sch. 2009 Jan 1;31(1):15–26. doi: 10.1093/cs/31.1.15

Table 3.

Multilevel Logistic Regression Models of Ethnic Labels

Model 1: Selected Multiple Labels vs. Single Label Model 2: Selected Other Hispanic vs. Did Not Model 3: Selected White vs. Did Not Model 4: Selected Black vs. Did Not Model 5: Selected American Indian vs. Did Not Model 6: Selected Asian vs. Did Not
Spanish Language Use
 With Family 0.63*** (−8.15) 0.89 (−1.43) 0.62*** (−5.70) 0.48*** (−5.05) 0.50*** (−7.85) 0.70* (−2.20)
 With Friends 1.05 (0.76) 1.08 (0.87) 1.06 (0.68) 1.15 (0.93) 1.05 (0.53) 1.08 (0.41)
Free or Reduced Lunch 0.44*** (−5.24) 0.72 (−1.36) 0.48*** (−3.64) 0.44** (−2.67) 0.54** (−2.96) 0.58 (−1.43)
Educational Expectations 0.97 (−0.79) 0.93 (−1.23) 1.10 (1.47) 1.04 (0.37) 0.82** (−3.28) 1.02 (0.17)
Age 0.95 (−0.69) 0.89 (−1.06) 0.86 (−1.36) 0.91 (−0.51) 0.83 (−1.67) 1.15 (0.65)
Female 1.20 (1.77) 1.28 (1.60) 1.33 (1.88) 1.17 (0.65) 1.25 (1.46) 0.67 (−1.29)
Intercept 3.29 (1.14) 0.56 (−0.38) 2.08 (0.49) 0.75 (−0.12) 14.33 (1.79) 0.01 (−1.59)
School-level variance 0.19** 0.29* 0.24* 0.24 0.17* 0.85*
N 2857 2857 2857 2857 2857 2857
*

p<.05,

**

p<.01,

***

p<.001, two-tailed tests

Note: Coefficients are odds ratios, t-statistics are in parentheses