Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 23;5(10):e1000540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000540

Figure 2. Backward steps are smaller than forward steps.

Figure 2

A. Probability distribution of step sizes using a approximately 26-fold periodic potential (see main text), showing that backward steps are on average smaller than forward steps, in agreement with experiment. Inset: Backward steps rely on low barriers, which occur preferentially where angular steps sizes (e.g. Inline graphic) are small. B–E. Forward steps immediately following or preceding backward steps are found to be smaller on average (Inline graphic in the experiment, Inline graphic in the model) than the mean of all forward steps (Inline graphic in model and experiment, black dots). Crosses denote mean and standard deviation of backward and subsequent or previous forward steps, while black dots and horizontal lines give the mean (Inline graphic) and standard deviations of all forward steps. Note change of scale between simulation and experiment. The experimental data are from [1].