Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2008 Mar 25;130(15):5178–5184. doi: 10.1021/ja710159q

Table 2.

Exchange Rate Analysis of MTRasy versus Tsat for Three Liposome Samples Using Three Different Methods Outlined in the Experimental Section

method sample klw (s-1) kwl (s-1) α T1wa (s) Plb (μm/s)
(i) 99 nm 194 0.89 0.85 2.11
199 nm 94 0.43 0.84 2.20 0.99 ± 0.21
536 nm 12 0.056 0.84 2.65
(ii) 99 nm 174 0.80 0.93
199 nm 88 0.40 0.95 1.85 0.89 ± 0.21
536 nm 13 0.062 0.99
(iii) 99 nm 221 1.02 0.88
199 nm 93 0.43 0.95 2.03 1.11 ± 0.14
536 nm 13 0.059 0.99
a

T1w is calculated for each sample in method (i); it is treated as a single fit parameter in methods (ii) and (iii).

b

Errors in permeability are 95% confidence intervals in the linear coefficients of exchange rates versus ΣS/V.