Skip to main content
. 2007 Aug 29;100(5):1053–1071. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm155

Table 5.

Distribution of QTLs on each linkage group based on (A) the null hypothesis for Poisson goodness of fit for the BCF1 (F1:2) and (B) on each linkage group based on the null hypothesis for Poisson goodness of fit F2 (F2:3)

Observed no. of QTL per 10-cM interval
LG 0–10 11–20 21–30 31–40 41–50 51–60 61–70 71–80 81–90 91–100 101–110 111–120 Expected χ2
(A)
1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 5 10 0 1·55 19928·7***
2 0 0 3 6 1 0 0 1·43 54·7***
3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0·17 0·0
4 1 1 0 0 2 4 0·67 38·1***
5 0 4 1 0 0 1·00 13·5**
6 1 0 2 0 0 0·60 0·8
7 2 6 2 7 0 0 2·83 21·8***
8 0 0 0 1 2 0 0·50 1·1
9 11 3 0 0 0 2·80 1608·5***
10 1 1 0 0 0 0 0·33 0·2
11 1 0 4 0 1·25 8·7*
(B)
1 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 6 2 0 0 1·08 113·7***
2 0 0 3 1 13 2 0 0 2·38 109414·0***
3 0 0 0 1 1 0 0·33 0·2
4 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0·43 1·3
5 2 0 0 0 0 0·40 3·5
6 0 0 0 0 0·00
7 2 4 3 0 2·25 2·6
8 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0·50 0·3
9 3 4 1 0 4 0 2·00 7·5
10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0·00
11 0 1 0 0 0·25 0·1

Expected number of QTL per 10-cM interval.

* P < 0·05; ** P < 0·01, *** P < 0·001.