Skip to main content
. 2007 Sep 19;100(6):1219–1228. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm221

Table 4.

Pairwise comparisons of FST between populations of Hymenaea stigonocarpa based on the psbC/trnS3 region of plastid DNA

Western group
Central group
Eastern group
SMC ITC PIC FAC CVC JTC TOC TUC FUC ADC DIC FBC PEC CHC MCC RPC MUC
ITC 0·848 0·000
PIC 0·022 0·735 0·000
FAC 0·182 0·674 0·204 0·000
CVC − 0·077 0·843 − 0·269 0·256 0·000
JTC 0·200 0·654 0·000 0·227 0·269 0·000
TOC 0·472 0·685 0·426 0·411 0·534 0·388 0·000
TUC − 0·059 0·751 0·062 0·200 0·007 0·198 0·458 0·000
FUC 0·361 0·605 0·398 0·399 0·449 0·371 0·462 0·397 0·000
ADC 1·000 0·940 0·848 0·812 0·922 0·841 0·841 0·904 0·227 0·000
DIC 1·000 0·925 0·831 0·790 0·914 0·816 0·818 0·892 0·197 0·000 0·000
FBC 0·778 0·806 0·734 0·704 0·803 0·698 0·727 0·762 0·255 0·205 0·167 0·000
PEC 0·840 0·867 0·779 0·756 0·838 0·763 0·784 0·809 0·254 0·033 0·006 0·189 0·000
CHC 0·793 0·819 0·738 0·708 0·809 0·700 0·724 0·769 0·209 − 0·112 − 0·040 0·134 0·039 0·000
MCC 0·692 0·713 0·715 0·.695 0·757 0·673 0·696 0·718 0·450 0·602 0·575 0·580 0·619 0·574 0·000
RPC 0·747 0·731 0·763 0·733 0·817 0·691 0·727 0·772 0·483 0·689 0·654 0·634 0·691 0·617 0·324 0·000
MUC 0·649 0·694 0·674 0·658 0·712 0·636 0·655 0·675 0·361 0·522 0·496 0·512 0·543 0·494 0·218 0·263 0·000

Values given in bold are not significant at P > 0·05.