Skip to main content
. 2008 Jan-Mar;42(1):68–72. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.38584

Table 1.

Clinical details of patients

ID Gender No. of feet Age (yrs) No. of previous surgeries Clinical presentation No. of cases for correction Heel cord surgery Tibialis anterior transfer Follow-up (months) Outcome
1 F 2 8.4 2 E C A V S 4 Lengthening Yes 7.5 Good
2 M 1 2.0 1 E C A V S 5 Tenotomy Yes 8.0 Good
3 M 2 4.8 1 E S 2 Lengthening Yes 16.4 Good
4 F 2 1.1 1 E V S 3 Tenotomy No 65.1 Good
5 F 2 5.5 2 E C A V S 3 Lengthening Yes 12.4 Good
6 M 1 5.3 2 A S 2 None Yes 13.1 Persistent hindfoot valgus
7 M 2 5.0 1 A S 2 None Yes 36.9 Good
8 F 2 4.3 1 A S 3 None Yes 4.4 Good
9 F 1 4.0 4 E C A V S 6 Lengthening Yes 8.2 Good
10 F 1 4.6 2 AS 1 None Yes 25.8 Persistent hindfoot valgus treated with hemiepiphyseodesis
11 M 1 5.5 2 AS 1 None Yes 20.2 Good

E - Equinus C - Cavus A - Forefoot adductus V - Hindfoot valgus S - Dynamic supination