Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 9.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroinformatics. 2008 Aug 13;6(4):279–290. doi: 10.1007/s12021-008-9023-0

Table 7.

The confusion matrices, showing the diagnostic accuracy of SVM classifiers for discrimination of three categories of vasospasm

RBF kernel Sigmoid kernel
(a) Vasospasm is categorized as class 1—normal (VA1), class 2—mild (VA2), and class 3—moderate or severe [VA(3–4)]
VA1-des VA2-des VA(3–4)-des VA1-des VA2-des VA(3–4)-des
VA1-act 0.9735 0.9412 0.2500 VA1-act 0.9735 0.9412 0.2500
VA2-act 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 VA2-act 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
VA(3–4)-act 0.0265 0.0588 0.7500 VA(3–4)-act 0.0265 0.0588 0.7500
Overall classification rate=0.8291 Overall classification rate=0.8291
(b) Vasospasm is categorized as class 1—normal (VA1), class 2—mild or moderate [VA(2–3)], and class 3—severe (VA4)
VA1-des VA(2–3)-des VA4-des VA1-des VA(2–3)-des VA4-des
VA1-act 0.9558 0.5833 0.1111 VA1-act 0.9558 0.6111 0.1111
VA(2–3)-act 0.0000 0.4167 0.5556 VA(2–3)-act 0.0000 0.3611 0.5556
VA4-act 0.0442 0.0000 0.3333 VA4-act 0.0442 0.0278 0.3333
Overall classification rate=0.7975 Overall classification rate=0.7848

Vasospasm is categorized in the same way as for the LVQ networks (see Table 5); the inputs of the SVM classifiers were also the same