Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 May 26.
Published in final edited form as: Biochemistry. 2009 May 26;48(20):4262–4272. doi: 10.1021/bi900241k

Table 1.

Calculated Reduction Potential for PRL-1 Residuesa

Residue E' (mV) ± SD δ-15N ox δ-1H ox δ-15N red δ-1H red Δδ (15N) Δδ (1H)
V12 −366.1 0.0 126.780 9.122 126.771 9.202 0.009 −0.080
R18 −364.6 2.0 121.848 5.764 121.919 5.837 −0.071 −0.073
L30 −364.0 1.0 124.349 7.359 124.543 7.302 −0.194 0.057
T43 −363.5 0.0 111.911 7.806 112.654 7.908 −0.743 −0.102
R47 −361.8 0.0 126.631 8.861 129.143 8.896 −2.512 −0.035
C49 −364.4 0.7 121.676 8.037 112.254 6.943 9.422 1.094
V65 −365.2 0.0 124.996 8.563 125.651 8.570 −0.655 −0.007
L66 −364.8 0.0 130.322 9.065 130.756 8.853 −0.434 0.212
I80 −364.8 1.3 119.137 7.235 119.000 6.994 0.137 0.241
R93 −364.7 2.3 118.477 7.287 118.344 7.236 0.133 0.051
I100 −364.9 2.4 127.986 8.162 127.919 8.230 0.067 −0.068
A101 −364.8 1.8 129.683 9.180 129.252 8.865 0.431 0.315
L114 −365.4 2.6 116.028 7.424 117.798 7.107 −1.770 0.317
E127 −363.9 1.6 118.621 9.219 119.105 9.187 −0.484 0.032
Y152 −362.7 1.9 122.770 7.129 123.362 7.099 −0.592 0.030

average −364.3 1.5
a

The reported E’ value for each residue corresponds to the average of both the reduced and oxidized peak heights fit to the equation listed in the methods section. The standard deviation (SD) is also reported in mV. Δδ values were calculated by subtracting the chemical shift of the reduced species from those of the oxidized species.