. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.

Published in final edited form as: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Jul 21;2(5):373–381. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.108.843227

Table 3.

Pearson correlation between PET measures of MGU_UpR, MFAO_UpR, and gene expression at W19

		ZDF/ZDF+Met			ZDF/ZDF+Rosi			ZDF/ZDF+MET/ZDF+Rosi
		ρ	P	N	ρ	P	N	ρ	P	N

MGU_UpR vs.	GLUT1	−0.66	0.02698^*	9	0.46	0.07531	11	0.40	0.07136	15
	GLUT4	0.01	0.48850	9	0.71	0.00710^*	11	0.55	0.01732^*	15
MFAO_UpR vs.	CD36	0.61	0.01728^*	12	−0.08	0.40411	12	−0.09	0.35652	18
	FATP1	0.09	0.39339	11	0.74	0.00441^*	11	0.48	0.03046^*	16
	mCPT1	0.68	0.00730^*	12	0.41	0.09085	12	0.36	0.07338	18
	MCAD	−0.05	0.43995	11	0.71	0.00741^*	11	0.38	0.07478	16

Significant at P<0.05

ρ denotes the Pearson correlation; P, significance value of correlation; N, number of data points; MGU_UpR, myocardial glucose utilization uptake rate constant; MFAO_UpR, myocardial fatty oxidation uptake rate constant