. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Nov 1.

Published in final edited form as: Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2009 Sep 19;86(2):111–116. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.08.004

Table 2.

Analysis of depression discussion and treatment by race.^a

	Unadjusted		Adjusted ^b

Dependent variable	OR (95% ci)	p ^c	OR (95% ci)	p^c
Discussed depression with primary care physician	0.11 (0.03 – 0.40)	.001	0.12 (0.03 – 0.58)	.008
Discussed depression with a friend or family member	0.38 (0.11 – 1.26)	.115	0.41 (0.12 – 1.35)	.140
Discussed depression with a clergyperson	0.38 (0.75 – 1.88)	.233	0.38 (0.08 – 1.95)	.249
Been prescribed medication for depression	0.10 (0.02 – 0.35)	<.001	0.08 (0.02 – 0.41)	.002
Seen a psychiatrist	0.04 (0.01 – 0.32)	.003	0.04 (0.01 – 0.33)	.003
Seen a counselor or psychologist	0.36 (0.12 – 1.11)	.076	0.36 (0.12 – 1.19)	.098

Ethnicity was coded as Caucasian = 0, African American = 1.

All models were adjusted for SES; additional covariates (age, glycemic control, treatment by insulin, number of elevated PHQ-9 scores) were included if p(entry)<.10.

Given p values were evaluated against a Bonferroni-adjusted p(criterion) of 0.0083.