Skip to main content
. 2009 Summer;2(3):146–158.

Table 5.

General Comparison of Absorbable Sutures

Suture Configuration Relative Tensile Strength Tissue Reactivity Handling Memory Absorption Degradation Mode
Plain surgical gut Twisted Weak High Fair Low Unpredictable Proteolytic
Chromic surgical gut Twisted Weak High Fair Low Unpredictable Proteolytic
Fast-absorbing coated polyglactin 910 (Vicryl Rapide™) Braided Weak Low Best Low Predictable Hydrolytic
Coated polyglactin 910 (Vicryl™) Braided Good Low Best Low Predictable Hydrolytic
Coated polyglycolide (Dexon II™) Braided Good Low Best Low Predictable Hydrolytic
Polyglytone 6211 (Caprosyn™) Monofilament Weak Low Good Low Predictable Hydrolytic
Poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl™) Monofilament Good Low Good Low Predictable Hydrolytic
Barbed poliglecaprone 25 (Monoderm™) Barbed Monofilamemt Good Low Good Low Predictable Hydrolytic
Glycomer 631 (Biosyn™) Monofilament Good Low Good Low Predictable Hydrolytic
Polyglyconate (Maxon™) Monofilament Strong Low Fair High Predictable Hydrolytic
Polydioxanone (PDS II™) Monofilament Strong Low Fair High Predictable Hydrolytic
Barbed polydioxanone (PDO) Barbed Monofilament Strong Low Fair High Predictable Hydrolytic

Monoderm, Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Vancouver, Canada; Biosyn, Caprosyn, Dexon II, and Maxon, Covidien AG, Mansfield, MA; Monocryl, PDS II, Vicryl, and Vicryl Rapide, Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ.