Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 13.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Res. 2008 Sep 5;103(7):e81–e95. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.185249

Fig 9.

Fig 9

Effect of E-4031 on the action potential. The left column shows action potentials from the Fink modified35 ten Tusscher action potential model36 in which hERG 1a/1b (blue) and hERG 1a (red) were substituted for the native IKr. As [E-4031] increases (0, 5, and 10 nM for panels A, B, and C respectively), APD90 increases, and IhERG decreases for both hERG 1a/1b and 1a. ΔAPD90 (the difference in APD90 between hERG 1a/1b and hERG 1a) also increases with [E-4031] ([E-4031] = 0 nM, ΔAPD90 = 38 ms; [E-4031] = 5 nM, ΔAPD90 = 168 ms; [E-4031] = 10 nM, ΔAPD90 = 728 ms). In all cases, APD90 is longer and peak IhERG is smaller for hERG 1a. For control and for [E-4031] = 5 nM, peak IhERG occurs later for hERG 1a. For hERG 1a at [E-4031] = 10 nM (bottom row, red), repolarization fails to occur within the 1 sec cycle length on odd numbered beats. To mark the takeoff potential of the odd beat for hERG 1a, we place a red arrow. The alternating pattern for hERG 1a is a consequence of sustained depolarization curtailing deactivation at the end of even beats.