Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Sci. 2009 Sep 14;20(10):1237–1244. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02437.x

Table 1.

Comparison of Posttask Appraisals in the Social-Evaluative Threat (SET) and Non-SET Conditions

Posttask appraisal Condition
SET (n = 19) Non-SET (n = 20) Difference

M SD M SD F p
Others evaluated performance 5.7 1.5 2.5 1.9 32.7 < .001
Task difficulty 4.9 1.2 4.4 1.3 1.5 > .20
Effort expended 2.8 1.6 2.3 1.3 0.9 > .20
Task challenge 4.8 1.6 5.0 1.2 0.2 > .20
Task controllability 4.1 1.4 4.0 1.7 0.1 > .20
Performance 3.5 1.3 3.4 1.3 0.0 > .20

Note. All ratings were made on 7-point scales. For evaluation by others, task difficulty, and task challenge, 1 = not at all and 7 = very much; for effort, 1 = tried hard and 7 = didn’t try hard; for task controllability, 1 = out of control and 7 = in control; and for performance 1 = very poorly and 7 = very well.