Table 1.
Comparison of Posttask Appraisals in the Social-Evaluative Threat (SET) and Non-SET Conditions
Posttask appraisal | Condition |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SET (n = 19) | Non-SET (n = 20) | Difference | ||||
M | SD | M | SD | F | p | |
Others evaluated performance | 5.7 | 1.5 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 32.7 | < .001 |
Task difficulty | 4.9 | 1.2 | 4.4 | 1.3 | 1.5 | > .20 |
Effort expended | 2.8 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 0.9 | > .20 |
Task challenge | 4.8 | 1.6 | 5.0 | 1.2 | 0.2 | > .20 |
Task controllability | 4.1 | 1.4 | 4.0 | 1.7 | 0.1 | > .20 |
Performance | 3.5 | 1.3 | 3.4 | 1.3 | 0.0 | > .20 |
Note. All ratings were made on 7-point scales. For evaluation by others, task difficulty, and task challenge, 1 = not at all and 7 = very much; for effort, 1 = tried hard and 7 = didn’t try hard; for task controllability, 1 = out of control and 7 = in control; and for performance 1 = very poorly and 7 = very well.