Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 14.
Published in final edited form as: Addiction. 2004 Aug;99(8):962–972. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00772.x

Table 4.

Effect of need–service matching and treatment duration on overall and primary drug use improvement.a

Parameter estimate (standard error)
Overall drug use improvement
Primary drug use improvement
Full model Without treatment duration Without needs service-matched Full model Without treatment duration Without needs service-matched
Percent of needs service-matched 0.049 (0.021)b 0.086 (0.021)d 0.028 (0.016) [P = 0.09] 0.050 (0.016)c
Treatment duration, per week 0.024 (0.003)d 0.025 (0.003)d 0.014 (0.002)d 0.015 (0.002)d
Past-year peak level of drug use 0.452 (0.008)d 0.448 (0.008)d 0.451 (0.008)d 0.204 (0.006)d 0.202 (0.006)d 0.203 (0.006)d
Reduction from past-year peak use 0.247 (0.073)d 0.276 (0.074)d 0.267 (0.070)d 0.373 (0.056)d 0.393 (0.056)d 0.374 (0.054)d
Female gender 0.092 (0.077) 0.094 (0.078) 0.092 (0.075) 0.093 (0.059) 0.092 (0.060) 0.102 (0.058)
Program treatment modality
 Methadone −1.363 (0.205)d −1.173 (0.225)d −1.375 (0.202)d −0.167 (0.152) −0.054 (0.163) −0.175 (0.149)
 Non-methadone out-patient Referent Referent Referent Referent Referent Referent
 Short-term residential 0.402 (0.214) 0.011 (0.234) 0.427 (0.210)b 0.344 (0.156)b 0.111 (0.168) 0.363 (0.154)b
 Long-term residential 0.166 (0.148) 0.099 (0.163) 0.192 (0.145) 0.320 (0.110)c 0.280 (0.118)b 0.343 (0.107)c
a

Among 3103 patients with any service need. From multivariate mixed model regressions clustering patients within programs.

b

P < 0.05;

c

P < 0.01;

d

P < 0.001.