Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 14.
Published in final edited form as: Health Psychol. 2006 Mar;25(2):249–254. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.2.249

Table 1.

Descriptive Statistics for Indicators of Latent Variables

Indicator of latent factors Factor loading Indirect effect of sensation seeking Indirect effect of negative affect
Risky sexual behavior
 No. of lifetime partnersa .89 .20 .05
 How soon sex with new partner .62* .14 .03
 Years of intercourse before age 20 years .47* .11 .04
Affiliation with risky partner
 Partner’s sexual risk behaviorsa .99 .25 .07
 Partner’s HIV risk behaviors .75* .19 .05
Drinking behavior
 Past year heavy drinkinga .81 .36 .10
 Past year drinking in social settings .77* .34 .09
 Past year drinking in sexual situations .64* .28 .08
Drug use
 Illicit drug usea .95 .35 .10
 Drug problemsb .89* .33 .09
 Past year illicit drug use in sexual situationsb .79* .29 .08
Impulsivityc
 Parcel 1a .83
 Parcel 2 .62*
 Parcel 3 .70*
Sensation seeking
 Parcel 1a .82
 Parcel 2 .81*
 Parcel 3 .67*
Anxiety
 Parcel 1a .88
 Parcel 2 .81*
 Parcel 3 .83*
Negative affect
 No. of symptoms — depressiona .77
 No. of symptoms — trauma .66*
a

Factor loading fixed to one to set scale of latent factor; significance not tested.

b

Indicates variables that were skewed and normalized using a log plus ten transformation for structural equation modeling.

c

Confirmatory factor analysis was performed separately to establish that these four factors were indeed the best structure of the personality variables, χ2 = 104.21, df = 38, normed fit index = .98, Tucker–Lewis index = .98, comparative fit index = .99, root-mean-square error of approximation = .042 (.032–.051).

*

p < .001.