Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun;27(3):379–390. doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v27i3.3380

Table 1.

Characteristics of respondents

Characteristics SBA (n=14) TBA (n=37) All-lay women (n=98) Subgroups of lay women
WRA (n=19) EIW (n=19) FF (n=20) REL (n=20) NBR (n=20)
Age (years) 42.0 52.6 41.5 28.4 63.3 27.4 50.4 39.1
  Mean (SD) (8.0) (11.5) (16.2) (6.5) (4.9) (6.4) (13.7) (9.8)
Parity 2.1 5.7 4.4 2.6 6.8 2.8 10.2 4.3
Mean (SD) (0.8) (2.4) (2.4)∗∗ (1.4) (2.2) (1.4) (21.3) (1.3)
Educational level
  No school 0.0 59.5 40.6 15.8 84.2 10.0 65.0 30.0
  1-5 year(s) 0.0 37.8 30.2 36.8 15.8 40.0 15.0 45.0
  6-10 years 35.7 2.7 24.0 42.1 0.0 40.0 15.0 20.0
  11-12 years 35.7 0.0 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
  Graduate school 28.6 0.0 1.0 5.3 0.0 10.0 5.0 5.0
Income (Tk) (%)
  <2,500 0.0 43.2 32.3 36.8 42.1 20.0 40.0 20.0
  2,500-5,000 >5,000 0.0 46.0 33.3 47.4 36.8 35.0 20.0 35.0
  >5,000 100.0 2.7 34.4 15.8 21.1 45.0 40.0 45.0
Religion (%)
  Hindu 7.1 10.8 12.5 10.5 21.1 10.0 10.0 10.0
  Muslim 92.9 89.2 87.5 89.5 78.9 90.0 90.0 90.0

∗2 missing

∗∗3 missing

EIW=Elder influential women; FF=Focal females who gave birth in 2005 and experienced postpartum haemorrhage; NBR=Focal female friend or neighbour; REL=Focal female relative; SBA=Skilled birth attendant; SD=Standard deviation; TBA=Traditional birth attendant; WRA=Women of reproductive age, who gave birth in 2005