Skip to main content
. 2009 Feb;27(1):41–52. doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v27i1.3316

Table 3.

Percentage of households with bacterial counts exceeding international guidelines

Bacterial counts cfu/g Water and complementary food samples p value
Water (n=53) LB0 (n=53) LB4 (n=53) SRP0 (n=53) SRP4 (n=53) Traditional foods (n=120)
Aerobic bacteria ≥104 cfu/g 50.9 (27)a 7.5 (4)b 49.1 (26)d 77.4 (41)c 92.5 (49)e 71.7 (86)f <0.001
Coliform ≥100 cfu/g 35.8 (19)a 1.9 (1)b 52.8 (28)d 75.5 (40)c 92.5 (49)e 45.8 (55)d <0.001
Enterobacteriaceae ≥100 cfu/g 50.9 (27)a 3.8 (2)b 58.5 (31)d 86.8 (46)c 98.1 (52)e 50.0 (60)d <0.001

Figures in parentheses indicate numbers

∗LB0 is Lishe bora immediately after preparation; LB4 is Lishe bora 4 hours after preparation; SRP0 is soy-rice porridge immediately after preparation; and SRP4 is soy-rice porridge 4 hours after preparation

†Bacterial counts in mean Log10 cfu/g; the assay cannot detect values <50 cfu/g

‡% (n) with χ2-test p value comparing water, LB0, and SRP0; LB0 and LB4; SRP0 and SRP4; LB4, SRP4, and traditional foods

¶Comparisons with unlike superscripts (a, b, c, d, e, and f) indicate significant differences (p<0.05) between subgroups; cfu=Colony-forming unit; LB=Lishe bora; SRP=Soy-rice porridge