Skip to main content
. 2009 Sep 24;18(9):1195–1205. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9539-2

Table 4.

Responsiveness of the EQ-5D and SF-6D to change in each of the groups, ordered by increasing magnitude of change (EQ-5D)

Mean (s.d.) change EQ-5D Effect size (ES) ES ratioa Standardised response mean (SRM) SRM ratioa
HΔ EQ-5D SF-6D EQ-5D SF-6D
Deterioration
 BROSG −0.05 (0.24) ~0.20 0.24 0.15 1.6 0.22 0.17 1.3
 BSRBR control −0.07 (0.28) ~0.20 0.24 0.08 3.0 0.23 0.08 2.9
 BROSG(D) (1 year) −0.13 (0.24) ~0.20 0.62 0.35 1.8 0.51 0.37 1.4
Improvement
 BROSG(I) (1 year) 0.06 (0.27) ~0.20 0.22 0.25 1.1 0.21 0.29 1.4
 BSRBR 0.15 (0.34) >0.50 0.46 0.82 1.8 0.44 0.64 1.5
 STIVEA 0.20 (0.31) ~0.50 0.64 0.97 1.5 0.64 0.83 1.3

HΔ hypothesised change (effect size), BROSG (D) = EQ-VAS score worse (>20% & <50%) than baseline; BROSG (I) = EQ-VAS score better (>20% & <50%) than at baseline

EQ-5D EuroQol-5D, SF-6D Short Form-6D, STIVEA steroids in very early arthritis, BROSG British Rheumatoid Outcome Study Group, BSRBR British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register, s.d. standard deviation

aCalculated as the larger of the effect size for the EQ-5D or SF-6D divided by the smaller effect size