Table 3.
France | Norway | |||
Diagnostic process | N | % | N | % |
Diagnosis after clinical suspicion | 994 | 59 | 282 | 73 |
Chance Discovery | 270 | 16 | 54 | 14 |
Diagnosis after screening in asymptomatic patient | 313 | 19 | 32 | 9 |
Implication of GP in the diagnostic procedure | 1310 | 78 | 319 | 83 |
Personal GP took diagnostic initiative | 1223 | 73 | 257 | 67 |
Another GP took diagnostic initiative | 87 | 5 | 62 | 16 |
Patient feared having cancer | 455 | 27 | 33 | 9 |
Therapy | ||||
Organisation of health care decided treatment team | 259 | 15 | 309 | 80 |
Treatment team reputation contributed to choice | 820 | 49 | 54 | 14 |
Patient or family contributed to choice | 489 | 29 | 47 | 12 |
GP implicated in choice of cancer treatment | 223 | 13 | 15 | 4 |
GP implicated in dealing with side effects of treatment | 910 | 54 | 180 | 47 |
GP implicated in administering chemotherapy | 68 | 4 | 34 | 9 |
GP = General Practitioner