Skip to main content
. 2009 Sep 23;8:218. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-218

Table 1.

Comparison of manual, digital, and conventional parasite density estimations

Slide Number of parasites counted per slide WC WCC Parasite density, as parasites/μl


Manual counts Digital counts Manual counts Digital counts Conventional counts
BF3A 5022 5071 323 8050 125161 126383 109725
BF5A 4516 4540 162 6400 178410 179358 152178
BF6A 10686 10438 118 5100 461853 451134 271600
BF7A 9373 9515 316 9800 290682 295085 200083
BF8A 344 289 125 2510 6908 5803 5834
BF9A 634 619 202 5020 15756 15383 11359
BF10A 1003 870 353 5400 15343 13309 18638
BF13A 2446 2158 290 9070 76501 67493 50110
BF18A 22477 21956 534 11100 467219 456389 429400
AMI3a 424 438 142 8000 23887 24676 17500
AMI26 127 140 200 8000 5080 5600 3975
AMI32 5819 6149 261 8000 178360 188475 125000
BF7Ab 8059 8251 260 9800 303762 310999 200083
BF8Ab 291 277 109 2510 6701 6379 5834
BF9Ab 369 333 132 5020 14033 12664 11359
BF13Ab 1373 1356 140 9070 88951 87849 50110
BF15A 3904 3914 152 6400 164379 164800 144050
BF16A 14265 14273 162 5100 449083 449335 313062
BF17A 6807 6999 199 9800 335219 344674 238467
AMI3b 281 272 119 8000 18891 18286 17500
Total 98220 97858 3226178 3224075 2375867
Mean 215

Data are kurtosis/skewness (K/Sk) and resultant factor RN, used to set digital particle counting algorithm for each slide; number of particles per slide counted manually and digitally, and compared by absolute % discrepancy, rank correlation, and signed rank test.