Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ethics Behav. 2009 Sep 1;19(5):379–402. doi: 10.1080/10508420903035380

Table 3.

Participant Characteristics

Sample
Weighted
Variance due
to Sampling
Error (%)
95% CI
k N Md SD L U χ 2 Nfs

Audience
 Graduate/Medical Students 9 399 .33 .42 36 –.49 1.15 25.27 6
 Undergraduate Students 13 2264 .40 .22 33 –.03 .83 39.66 13
 Residents/Interns 4 378 .66 .18 30 .30 1.01 6.87 9
Field of Study
 Medicine 6 185 .05 .25 70 –.42 .53 8.61 --
 Health 5 1155 .44 .00 100 .44 .44 4.01 6
 Psychology/Counseling 8 535 .66 .29 43 .09 1.23 18.48 18
 Other 4 685 .24 .24 29 –.23 .71 13.78 1
Participant Gender
 70% Males 3 347 .02 .13 70 –.23 .26 4.34 --
 Mixed Gender 3 104 .27 .00 100 .27 .27 .12 1
 70% Females 9 787 .40 .35 28 –.29 1.09 32.64 9
Participant Age
 70% less than 35 7 274 .22 .40 41 –.55 1.00 17.16 1
 Mixed Ages 4 142 .45 .46 37 –.45 1.34 10.89 5
Participants had Incentive
 No 7 1182 .41 .00 100 .41 .41 6.36 7
 Yes 16 1545 .36 .34 27 –.30 1.03 59.35 13

Note. k = number of effect sizes; N = Total sample; M d = Sample weighted mean effect size (d) corrected for measurement error; SD = Standard deviation of mean effect size; CI = Confidence interval; L = Lower; U = Upper; Nfs = Orwin’s (1983) Fail safe N (number of null effects to reduce M d below .20); -- = effect size already below .20.