Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ethics Behav. 2009 Sep 1;19(5):379–402. doi: 10.1080/10508420903035380

Table 5.

Instructional Content

Sample
Weighted
Variance due
to Sampling
Error (%)
95% CI
k N Md SD L U χ 2 Nfs

Overarching Instructional Objective
 Moral Development 4 619 .17 .28 25 –.38 .73 16.18 --
 Ethical Sensitivity 7 780 .42 .11 74 .19 .64 9.48 8
 Decision Making/Problem-Solving 9 1234 .52 .15 59 .23 .81 15.31 14
Overarching Instructional Approach
 Social-Interactional 6 938 .37 .22 35 –.06 .80 16.92 5
 Cognitive 12 1366 .44 .22 43 .01 .87 28.06 14
Type of Skills Instructed
 Domain-Specific 15 2257 .35 .27 27 –.18 .89 55.97 11
 Global 9 744 .64 .11 81 .43 .86 11.12 20
Ethical Domains Coverage
 No 4 460 –.11 .14 66 –.38 .15 6.06 --
 Yes 16 2014 .48 .14 62 .20 .76 26.00 22
Ethical Behaviors Taxonomy
 No 6 579 .03 .00 100 .03 .03 5.07 --
 Yes 12 1829 .51 .15 55 .21 .80 21.75 19
Ethical Standards Coverage
 No 6 1192 .20 .25 24 –.29 .71 24.98 --
 Yes 14 1282 .52 .19 57 .16 .88 24.38 22
Problems in EDM Coverage
 No 10 1845 .33 .17 43 .00 .67 23.33 7
 Yes 9 575 .57 .30 43 –.01 1.16 20.91 17
Strategies for EDM Coverage
 No 7 1229 .22 .25 27 –.27 .71 25.93 1
 Yes 13 1245 .52 .20 53 .13 .90 24.20 21

Note. k = number of effect sizes; N = Total sample; M d = Sample weighted mean effect size d corrected for measurement error; SD = Standard deviation of mean effect size; CI = Confidence interval; L = Lower; U = Upper; Nfs = Orwin’s (1983) Fail safe N (number of null effects to reduce M d below .20); EDM = ethical decision-making; -- = effect size already below .20.