. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 15.

Published in final edited form as: Int J Comput Vis. 2008 Feb 1;76(2):183–204. doi: 10.1007/s11263-007-0050-3

Table 1.

This table shows the timing results for our Matlab implementations of the four fitting algorithms evaluated in Sect. 5.1.2 in milliseconds. The results were obtained on a dual 2.5 GHz Power Mac G5 machine and were averaged over 600 image triples with VGA (640 × 480) resolution. Each algorithm was allowed to iterate until convergence over each image triple. Note that the results for the single-view algorithm is just the cost of processing one image from the image triple

Algorithm	Time per frame	Iterations per frame	Time per iteration
2D+3D single-view	33.808	2.5209	13.401
uncalibrated multi-view	152.33	3.2915	46.247
scaled orthographic	152.94	3.2178	47.534
weak perspective	125.94	2.6131	48.158