Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug 14;24(10):1089–1094. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0979-8

Table 4.

Comparison of Younger vs. Older Adults Who Used Complementary/Alternative Medicine Services Following a Cancer Diagnosis (N = 836)

  Age <60 years*, n = 610, n(%) Age ≥60 years*, n = 226, n(%) p value†
  Did not use Used, not helpful Used, helpful Did not use Used, not helpful Used, helpful
Acupuncture 575 (94) 7 (1) 28 (5) 220 (98) 2 (0.9) 3 (1) 0.15
Acupressure 592 (97) 2 (0.3) 16 (3) 224 (99) 0 (0) 1 (0.4) 0.18
Naturopathy 521 (86) 12 (2) 76 (12) 204 (91) 4 (2) 17 (8) 0.25
Homeopathy 524 (86) 17 (3) 69 (11) 213 (95) 4 (2) 8 (3) 0.005
Herbalism 542 (89) 6 (1) 61 (10) 210 (93) 3 (1) 12 (5) 0.19
Iridology 589 (97) 7 (1) 13 (2) 224 (99) 0 (0) 1 (0.4) 0.13
Aromatherapy 529 (87) 16 (3) 65 (11) 211 (94) 3 (1) 10 (4) 0.01
Massage therapy 463 (76) 4 (1) 143 (23) 191 (84) 1 (0.4) 34 (15) 0.06
Therapeutic touch 574 (94) 5 (1) 31 (5) 217 (97) 0 (0) 7 (3) 0.31
Energy healing 557 (91) 6 (1) 47 (8) 218 (97) 1 (0.4) 6 (3) 0.009
Spiritual healing 524 (86) 4 (1) 78 (13) 202 (90) 1 (0.4) 21 (9) 0.49
Prayer 411 (67) 14 (2) 185 (30) 155 (69) 1 (0.4) 69 (31) 0.30
Folk remedies 601 (98) 4 (1) 5 (1) 222 (99) 2 (1) 0 (0) 0.58
Dietary supplements 405 (67) 26 (4) 175 (29) 169 (75) 6 (3) 49 (22) 0.10

*Age at time of cancer diagnosis; †chi square test for difference among proportions

Groups may not total exactly 100% because percentages above 1.0 are rounded