Table 5.
Gut Region | P. cf. n. “Marañon” | P. nocturnus | Pt. disjunctivus | H. pyrineusi |
---|---|---|---|---|
Proximal | 2.95 ± 0.65 | 1.50 ± 0.23 | 2.44 ± 0.41 | 1.00 ± 0.16a |
Mid | 2.85 ± 1.40 | 1.94 ± 0.39 | 2.40 ± 0.44 | 3.20 ± 0.79b |
Distal | 2.10 ± 0.33 | 1.65 ± 0.32 | 3.50 ± 0.68 | 2.01 ± 0.40ab |
F 2,17 = 0.26 | F 2,17 = 0.48 | F 2,17 = 1.28 | F 2,14 = 4.55 | |
P = 0.77 | P = 0.63 | P = 0.31 | P = 0.03 |
Values are mean (±SEM). Comparisons of SCFA concentrations among gut regions within a species were made with ANOVA, with differences considered significant at P = 0.05. If significant differences were detected with ANOVA, this was followed by a Tukey’s HSD multiple comparison test with a family error rate of P = 0.05. Those values sharing a superscript letter are not significantly different. Sample sizes were as follows: P. cf. n. “Marañon”, n = 6; P. nocturnus, n = 6; Pt. disjunctivus, n = 10; H. pyrineusi, n = 5. Acetate:propionate:butyrate ratios for total SCFAs were as follows: P. cf. n. “Marañon” = 62:23:15; P. nocturnus = 44:31:25; Pt. disjunctivus = 70:16:14; H. pyrineusi = 52:28:20