Detection probability
|
Components
|
Distributions
|
Rationale
|
Medically attended illness |
probability of testing, followup and reporting among medically attended cases |
Uniform(.2,.35) |
Data from CDC epi-aids in
Delaware and Chicago [19]
|
|
PCR test sensitivity |
Uniform(.95,1) |
Assumption [19]
|
Hospitalization (Milwaukee) |
probability of testing, followup and reporting among hospitalized cases |
Uniform(.2,.4) |
Assumption [19]
|
|
PCR test sensitivity |
Uniform(.95,1) |
Assumption [19]
|
ICU admission (Milwaukee) |
probability of testing, followup and reporting among hospitalized cases |
Uniform(.2,.4) |
Assumption [19]
|
|
PCR test sensitivity |
Uniform(.95,1) |
Assumption [19]
|
Deaths (Milwaukee) |
PCR test sensitivity and other detection |
Beta(45,5) |
Assumption [19] (mean 0.9,
standard deviation 0.05) |
Hospitalization (New York City) |
probability of performing PCR (rapid A positive or ICU/ventilated) |
.27+.73 (Uniform(.2,.71)) |
27% of cases were ICU-admitted
so received PCR test; remainder were
tested if rapid A positive, which has a
sensitivity of .2 [17] to .71 (sensitivity among ICU patients in NYC) |
|
PCR test sensitivity |
Uniform(.95,1) |
Assumption [19]
|
ICU/ventilation (New York City) |
PCR test sensitivity |
Uniform(.95,1) |
Assumption [19]
|
Deaths (New York City) |
PCR test sensitivity and other detection |
Beta(45,5) |
Assumption [19](mean 0.9,
standard deviation 0.05) |