Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 May;137(2):201–225. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.201

Table A1.

Phenotypic Correlations Among the Measures

Task 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1. Antisaccade --
2. Stop-signal .31 --
3. Stroop .16 .18 --
4. Keep-track .17 .27 .22 --
5. Letter-memory .25 .19 .25 .45 --
6. Spatial 2-back .22 .28 .12 .29 .28 --
7. Number–letter .16 .28 .23 .15 .23 .15 --
8. Color–shape .21 .25 .27 .17 .18 .14 .40 --
9. Category switch .19 .30 .24 .17 .17 .17 .50 .48 --
10. WAIS-IQ .25 .25 .27 .52 .40 .31 .07 .14 .19 --
11. Hidden patterns .23 .23 .31 .27 .22 .18 .26 .24 .28 .47 --
12. Perceptual speed .17 .27 .34 .36 .35 .24 .19 .20 .16 .44 .46 --
13. Identical pictures .22 .23 .21 .27 .23 .18 .27 .27 .26 .42 .59 .57 --

Note. Correlations are maximum likelihood estimates (from Mplus) based on all data, adjusted for missingness and nonindependence. Total N = 582. Directionality of the reaction time measures was reversed so that for all tasks, higher scores indicate better performance.