Skip to main content
. 2009 May 11;11(2):e15. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1151

Table 4.

Subjective benefit and user impressions

Number and percentage of participants
Overall impression: How did you like the program, all in all? (1 - 6 scale, 1 = very good, 6 = seriously flawed)
Liked the program (1-3) 164 (83%)
Did not like the program (4-6) 34 (17%)
Subjective benefit: Do you have the sense that the program helped you?
Helped me a lot 28 (14%)
Helped me a little 139 (68%)
Did not help 36 (18%)
Did more harm than help 0 (0%)
User satisfaction: Did the program meet your expectations?
Positively surprised: The program exceeded my expectations 36 (18%)
Satisfied: The program met my expectations 119 (60%)
Disappointed: The program did not meet my expectations 42 (21%)
Quality of content: How would you rate the program’s tips and suggestions compared to a “real” (human) psychotherapist?
Content was better than human therapist 31 (16%)
Content was about as good as human therapist 111 (58%)
Content was worse than human therapist 48 (25%)
Recommendations: Would you recommend the program to others...
...who are suffering from mild depression?
- would definitely not recommend it 5 (3%)
- would probably not recommend it 4 (2%)
- would recommend it with reservations 32 (16%)
- would definitely recommend it 156 (79%)
...who are suffering from moderately severe depression?
- would definitely not recommend it 9 (5%)
- would probably not recommend it 31 (16%)
- would recommend it with reservations 92 (47%)
- would definitely recommend it 63 (32%)
...who are suffering from severe depression?
- would definitely not recommend it 56 (29%)
- would probably not recommend it 57 (29%)
- would recommend it with reservations 60 (31%)
- would definitely recommend it 21 (11%)