Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 31;11(3):e33. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1222

Table 5.

Risk communication formats used by Internet-based cancer risk assessment tools to communicate individualized risk estimates (N = 47)

Risk Communication Format Example n %
Words or numbers
Words only Your risk is low. 24 51.1
Numbers only Your risk is 2%. 16 34.0
Botha Your risk is 2%. This is a low risk. 5 10.6
Neither You may only need to continue screening. 2 4.3
Type of numeric informationb, c
Percent Your risk is 2%. 17 81.0
Frequency (n in 1000) Your risk is 20 in 1000. 6 28.6
Frequency (1 in N) Your risk is 10 in 500. 4 19.1
Relative risk ratio Your risk is 2 times higher than average. 2 9.5
Odds Your odds of getting cancer are 2:98. 1 4.8
Risk estimate as absolute or comparative information
Absolute risk only Your risk is low.” OR “Your risk is 2%. 21 44.7
Comparative risk only Your risk is higher than average. 10 21.3
Absolute and comparative risk Your risk is 2%. This is below average. OR Your risk is 2%. The average risk is 3%. 14 29.8
Neither absolute nor comparative risk You may only need to continue screening. 2 4.3
Types of comparative risk information
Compared to other people only (not hazards) Your risk is higher than average. 21 44.7
Compared to other people and hazards Your risk of getting cancer is 12%, which is higher than average. The risk of being injured in a car accident is 10%. 3 6.4
No comparison information 23 48.9
Contextual informationb
Positive framing Your risk is 2 in 100. This means your chances of not getting cancer are 98 in 100. 3 6.4
Duration of risk Your 5-year risk is... 23 48.9
Safety messages
At least one Stop smoking 39 83.0
None 8 17.0
Visual display
At least one Bar graph, line graph, table 18 38.3
None 29 61.7
Acknowledgment of uncertainty: Estimate is...b
only an estimate Your actual risk might be different. 14 29.8
probabilistic High risk doesn’t mean you’ll get cancer. 15 31.9
based on population This estimate is based on data from large clinical trials. 8 17.0
Any acknowledgment 25 53.2

aIn general, the formats printed in italics are associated with increased comprehension and reduced bias of risk information. For comprehensive reviews see [21,22,24-27].

bThe individual elements within the categories type of numeric information, additional information, and acknowledgment of uncertainty were not mutually exclusive.

cThis category is restricted to the 21 websites that provided numeric risk information.