Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 19.
Published in final edited form as: Crit Care Med. 2008 Mar;36(3):706–714. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0B013E3181544248

Table 3.

One-way Sensitivity Analyses Comparing Propofol and Midazolam

Average Difference in Ventilation Duration, Days
Propofol 4 5 6 6 6
Midazolam 6 6 6 5 4
ICU Costs
  Propofol 27,044 32,595 38,147 37,792 37,437
  Midazolam 37,437 37,729 38,147 32,595 27,044
Hospital Ward Costs
  Propofol 6,209 7,626 9,042 8,952 8,861
  Midazolam 8,861 8,952 9,042 7,626 6,209
Sedative Costs
  Propofol 383 470 557 555 553
  Midazolam 227 232 238 204 169
Total Costs
  Propofol 33,636 40,690 47,745 47,299 46,851
  Midazolam 46,525 46,976 47,426 40,423 33,421
Incremental costs −12,889 −6,286 319 6,876 13,430
MVFDs
  Propofol 16.684 16.305 15.926 15.951 15.975
  Midazolam 15.975 15.951 15.926 16.305 16.684
Incremental effects 0.709 0.354 0 −0.354 −0.709
ICERs propofol propofol midazolam midazolam Midazolam
dominates dominates less costly dominates dominates

ICU = intensive care unit, MVFD = mechanical ventilator-free days, ICER = incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

*

Assumes baseline average of 6 days of mechanical ventilation.