Table 5.
Predictors of nutritional risk
Black women |
Black men |
White women |
White men |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beta | t | p value | Beta | t | p value | Beta | t | p value | Beta | t | p value | |
Social isolation | ||||||||||||
Live in rural area | –0.056 | –0.861 | 0.390 | 0.086 | 1.320 | 0.189 | 0.116 | 1.734 | 0.084 | 0.058 | 0.875 | 0.382 |
Reliable transportation | 0.196 | 2.896 | 0.004 | 0.064 | 1.009 | 0.314 | 0.093 | 1.459 | 0.146 | 0.195 | 2.957 | 0.003 |
Independent life–space | –0.344 | –4.626 | <0.001 | –0.245 | –3.415 | 0.001 | –0.297 | –4.121 | <0.001 | –0.282 | –4.151 | <0.001 |
Social support | ||||||||||||
Married | 0.050 | 0.704 | 0.482 | –0.245 | –3.415 | 0.001 | –0.029 | –0.376 | 0.707 | –0.056 | –0.824 | 0.411 |
Social support scale | 0.086 | 1.343 | 0.181 | –0.003 | –0.052 | 0.958 | 0.156 | 2.425 | 0.016 | –0.023 | –0.346 | 0.730 |
Social capital | ||||||||||||
Years at address | –0.043 | –0.628 | 0.531 | –0.031 | –0.479 | 0.633 | 0.040 | 0.688 | 0.492 | –0.084 | –1.276 | 0.203 |
Religious attendance | –0.102 | –1.502 | 0.135 | –0.185 | –2.781 | 0.006 | –0.054 | –0.869 | 0.386 | –0.033 | –0.487 | 0.627 |
Fear attack | –0.033 | –0.479 | 0.632 | 0.143 | 2.300 | 0.023 | 0.056 | 0.953 | 0.342 | 0.009 | 0.136 | 0.892 |
Experienced discriminated | 0.117 | 1.756 | 0.081 | 0.157 | 2.450 | 0.015 | –0.024 | –0.416 | 0.678 | 0.017 | 0.253 | 0.801 |
Veteran | – | – | – | –0.112 | –1.664 | 0.098 | – | – | – | 0.081 | 1.112 | 0.268 |
Control variables | ||||||||||||
Age | –0.058 | –0.772 | 0.441 | –0.020 | –0.302 | 0.763 | 0.016 | 0.231 | 0.818 | 0.049 | 0.704 | 0.482 |
Level of education | 0.040 | 0.517 | 0.606 | –0.057 | –0.760 | 0.448 | –0.094 | –1.288 | 0.199 | –0.076 | –1.008 | 0.314 |
Income |
–0.185 |
–2.227 |
0.027 |
–0.112 |
–1.387 |
0.167 |
–0.216 |
–2.259 |
0.025 |
–0.155 |
–1.957 |
0.052 |
R2=0.280, F(13.553 )=5.930, p<0.001 | R2=0.353, F(13.691)=7.887, p<0.001 | R2=0.387, F(13.612)=9.962, p<0.001 | R2=0.229, F(13.281)=4.576, p<0.001 |